You are Unregistered, please register to gain Full access.    
DENTOCAFE
Click here
DENTOCAFE » Speciality Zone » Orthodontics & Dentofacial Orthopaedics » The Use of Model Templates for Class II Treatment.

Donation Goal
Goal amount for this month: 200 USD, Received: 0 USD (0%)
Donate Now
Please Donate to support DentOCafe.com We really need you to help us with the ever increasing server hosting costs so that we can provide you rich & premium content. Any amount will be highly appreciated!

Reply
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
The Use of Model Templates for Class II Treatment.
  #1 (permalink)  
Old February 14th, 2007, 01:37 PM
Dr. Smile
Status: Offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Feb 1998
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 25,958
Rep Power: 10
Dr. Smile has a reputation beyond reputeDr. Smile has a reputation beyond reputeDr. Smile has a reputation beyond reputeDr. Smile has a reputation beyond reputeDr. Smile has a reputation beyond reputeDr. Smile has a reputation beyond reputeDr. Smile has a reputation beyond reputeDr. Smile has a reputation beyond reputeDr. Smile has a reputation beyond reputeDr. Smile has a reputation beyond reputeDr. Smile has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via ICQ to Dr. Smile Send a message via AIM to Dr. Smile Send a message via MSN to Dr. Smile Send a message via Yahoo to Dr. Smile Send a message via Skype™ to Dr. Smile
The Use of Model Templates for Class II Treatment.



The Use of Model Templates for Class II Treatment.


The treatment plan for Class II malocclusions, in which a retrusive mandible is the predominating characteristic, should be based on a individualized model template with the objectives of obtaining optimal results while controlling undesired tooth movement. These model templates should be simple and easy to read, yet, easily adaptable for more complex cases as needed. They include two types of model templates the "subjective" and "objective" which are constructed utilizing extra-oral photos and cephalometric x-rays respectively.
The first model is produced based on the subjective principles of beauty as determined in profile. The construction of comparative images helps to overcome the limitations of standard orthodontic record photographs.The subjective model for patients with Class II malocclusion due to mandibular deficiency is obtained by extra-oral photos of the patient with the mandible in Class I or near Class I occlusal relationship.The goal is to analyze succeeding modifications of the profile, necessitaing photographs of the patient with lips in contact and in the rest position. It is crucial to obtain these immediately after obtaining the pre-treatment facial profile image. In this way it is possible to produce the most accurate comparison by avoiding some common errors, such as alteration in head position or extension of the neck. Digital cameras are most helpful in this as they allow for immediate visualization of the image.
Some difficulties in obtaining this kind of model photograph stem from the limited capacity of the patient to maintain his or her lips in contact without contracting the muscles, or in some of the most severely retrusive cases, advancing the mandible to the extent desired by the orthodontist. It is possible to resolve this problem by stimulating the associated muscles over a two month period with the help of a mini-stimulator.


After analyizing the photos produced in this manner, a proposed profile and occlusion are determined. This is the subjective model.
The objective model is the second of the two types of model templates and is so named because of the capacities it offers to compare the results.It is based on a cephalometric profile radiograph with a mandible advanced and, according to the extra-oral photography, adjusted to the position that the observer considered the most acceptable and classified found by the subjective model. This radiography should also reflect the labial position in the subjective model (lips open or closed).
Using a simplified analysis, taking into consideration the position of the upper and lower incisors relative to the Nasion � Sela line, allows a rapid estimate of goals and at the same time helps illustrate the difficulties and requirements for tooth movement. This helps the practitioner create the conditions for mandibular advancement while avoiding any undesired movement of the incisors.
There are some impediments to the creation of these models, namely if the incisors are severely crowded or if the upper incisors are palatally positioned impeding the mandibular advance. Production of the subjective and objective models can be constructed after the teeth have been aligned enough to accomodate the jaw repositioning.


In conclusion, the subjective model permits the analysis of the patient's profile in order to decide if mandibular advancement is indicated and if so, to what extent. The subjective model can be compared to the finished case for evaluation of the results obtained.end of the treatment and it allows for a speculation on the results obtained. The objective model determines what movement of the incisors is permitted in order to reposition a mandible without damage to the esthetic value obtained in the subjective model. It can be compared with the final radiographies and it makes it possible to analyze teeth movement that could not have been controlled and to what extent they prejudicated the treatment.
The only inconvenience to this technique is the additional radiation to which the patient is subjected.





Pretreatment cephalogram

Pretreatment front face Pretreatment Profile, lips in contact Pretreatment profile lips at rest

Pretreatment intraoral lateral view

Pretreatment intraoral front view
Subjective model front face
Subjective model, lateral view with lips in contact
Subjective model, lateral view with lips at rest

Subjective model, lateral intraoral



Subjective model, intraoral frontal view
Objective model, lateral cephalogram with mandible advanced.

Patient in treatment utilizing the Ritto appliance





Post treatment front face
Post treatment, profile, lips in contact
Post treatment, profile, lips at rest

Post treatment lateral intraoral

Post treatment frontal intraoral



Final cephalogram. In comparison with the objective model we don't find great movements of the incisors after 1 year of treatment.


Patient 1.5 years after treatment

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
class, model, templates, treatment

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Photodynamic ablation of a selected rat embryo: a model for the treatment of extrauterine pregnancy Indigenious Pregnancy & Fertility 0 June 6th, 2008 03:26 AM
Class sparing regimens for initial treatment of HIV Dr. Smile News & Articles 0 May 15th, 2008 07:24 AM
The shape and size of the sella turcica in skeletal Class I, Class II, and Class III Dr. Smile Orthodontics & Dentofacial Orthopaedics 0 November 1st, 2007 09:53 AM
The Treatment of Class III Malocclusion Dr. Smile Orthodontics & Dentofacial Orthopaedics 0 June 13th, 2007 01:28 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:49 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272